Rosenfeld, Yards. J. (2010, April). Appointment on the internet: An upswing of Web sites because a personal intermediary. Speech from the Population Association regarding America Conferences, Dallas, Tx. [ Website links ]
Shtatfeld, R., & Barak, Good. (2009). Items connected with unveiling interpersonal relationships with the Internet dating sites: A perspective on the societal replace principle. Interpersona: An international Journal on the Personal Matchmaking, step 3, 19-37. [ Backlinks ]
Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H-P. (2010). Just who relationships exactly who? Educational homophily in the on line mate alternatives. European Sociological Review. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S. (1998a). Insiders’ point of views toward reasons for appeal so you’re able to a near most other. Social Therapy Every quarter, 61, 287-three hundred. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S. (1998b). Exactly what enjoys hitched lovers keen on both? Totally free Query for the Imaginative Sociology, twenty six, 193-2 hundred. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The significance of thought of correspondence to have intimate and friendship destination experience through the a rating-knowledgeable about day. Identity and Public Mindset Bulletin, 20, 391400. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The fresh new dictate of moms and dads and you will family towards the high quality and balances regarding personal relationships: A around three-revolution longitudinal study. Record off ily, 54, 888-900. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Intimate partners’ attitudes off social media features for the passage of some time relationships transitions. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willetts, Yards. C. (2002). Social networks and alter inside individual matchmaking https://lovingwomen.org/sv/bumble-recension/. Within the A beneficial. Vangelisti, H. Reis, & M. A great. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and alter within the Dating (pp. 257-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Drive. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Preference two things (in certain some body) over anybody else: Spouse choices for the romantic relationship and you can relationships. Journal out-of Public and private Matchmaking, 19, 463-481. [ Backlinks ]
Private Dating, eight, 325-340
Sprecher, S., Schwartz, P., Harvey, J., & Hatfield, Age. (2008). Inside S. Sprecher, A beneficial. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Manual of relationships initiation (pp. 249-265). New york: Mindset Press/Taylor & Francis. [ Links ]
Straaten, I., Engles, R. C. M. Age., Finkenauer, C., & Holland, R. W. (2009). Fulfilling your own match: How attractiveness resemblance influences strategy choices in the blended-sex dyads. Identification and you will Social Mindset Bulletin, thirty-five, 685-697. [ Backlinks ]
Sunnafrank, M., & Miller, G. R. (1981). The new part from initial discussions when you look at the deciding attraction so you’re able to equivalent and dissimilar complete strangers. People Communication Lookup, 8, 16-25. [ Links ]
Sunnafrank, Yards., & Ramirez, Good. (2004). Initially: Persistent relational ramifications of rating-familiar with talks. Journal away from Public and private Relationships, 21, 361-379. [ Website links ]
Tenny, Elizabeth. R., Turkheimer, Age., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Are liked is over having a good character: The latest part regarding matching. Diary of Look in the Identity, 43, 479-585. [ Links ]
Vangelisti, A. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.) (2006). New Cambridge handbook out-of private dating. Cambridge University Force. [ Hyperlinks ]
Thebusinessoflove: Matchmaking initiation within Web sites relationship functions
Walster, G.,W., Hatfield, Elizabeth., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of real attractiveness in the matchmaking choices. Log out-of Identity and you will Personal Psychology, 4, 508-516. [ Hyperlinks ]
Watson, D., Klohnen, Elizabeth. C., Casillas, An excellent., Simms, Elizabeth N., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Meets manufacturers and you can offer breakers: Analyses out of assortative mating in newlywed partners. Diary of Identification, 72, 1029-1068. [ Website links ]
Whisman, Meters. A., Seashore, S. R. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Was relationship dissension taxonic and certainly will taxonic status become examined reliably? Is a result of a nationwide, representative test off maried people. Journal from Contacting and Scientific Psychology, 76, 745-755. [ Website links ]